Former Vice President of Nigeria, Atiku Abubakar, has described evidence of the failures of President Bola Tinubu’s economic policies as overwhelming.
He noted that the Presidency failed in its bid to provide a credible defence of Tinubu’s failures in tackling Nigeria’s economic challenges.
This was contained in a statement signed by Abubakar’s Media Adviser, Paul Ibe, in Abuja on Tuesday.
He said: “The Presidential Spokesman, Bayo Onanuga, failed to provide a credible defence of Bola Tinubu’s failures in tackling the economic challenges facing the country. In his characteristic manner, he resorts to insults and name-calling.
“He demonstrates ignorance of the happenings around him, as he denies, for example, that Bola Tinubu’s policies are creating excruciating pain and causing despair. We wish to respond to him as follows:
“Did Atiku Abubakar offer any better policy options in his run for the presidency?
“Yes, he did. His living prescriptions contrast sharply with Bola Tinubu’s morbid policies. Atiku’s policy document, My Covenant With Nigerians, offers a clearly defined and robust roadmap for the socio-political and economic transformation of Nigeria.
“On the economy, the policy document outlines the challenges we face and our vision to get the economy on its feet and create prosperity. If Bayo desires, he can have a copy for free!
“That all the major presidential candidates supported the withdrawal of subsidy on PMS.
“But so, what? Even if all the major candidates agreed that the fuel subsidy regime must end and that the multiple exchange rates must be fixed, this would not translate into endorsing Bola Tinubu’s failures in implementation.
“The truth is that, unlike Atiku, Bola Tinubu did not understand the reforms he embarked upon and had no idea what steps to take to mitigate their negative impact.
“As a leader with foresight, Atiku anticipated that the withdrawal of subsidy and the unification of exchange rates could, in the absence of fundamental interventions, impact negatively on micro and small enterprises in the informal sector.
“He anticipated that such policies could elevate the levels of vulnerability and deprivation of poor families, including youth and adults with no incomes.”
Ibe further said, “The former Vice President, therefore, pledged to support Nigeria’s businesses by creating an Economic Stimulus Fund with an initial investment capacity of approximately US$10 billion to prioritise support to MSMEs across all the economic sectors, as they offer the greatest opportunities for achieving inclusive growth.
“The Fund was designed to make it easier for Nigeria’s 60 million micro and small enterprises to navigate the stormy seas in the aftermath of the withdrawal of subsidy on PMS.
“In contrast, Bola Tinubu offered a paltry N125 billion to help the MSMEs, which at today’s exchange rate is no more than US100 million. Of course, Bayo Onanuga is aware that the pledge is yet to be redeemed by the president.
“Atiku also pledged to implement a robust social investment programme to support the poor and vulnerable with CCTs.
“Atiku’s support to the poor and vulnerable would include prioritised actions to address the challenges of displacement and the sufferings of IDPs across the country.
“In contrast, the funds for Tinubu’s CCT were cornered by his officials in the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs.
“Alongside the Economic Stimulus Fund, Atiku pledged to launch a uniquely designed skills-to-job programme that would target all categories of youth, including graduates and early school leavers, as well as the massive numbers of uneducated youth who are currently not in education, employment, or training.
“As a leader of vision, Atiku was ready for the potential fallout of his policies. Bola Tinubu was clearly not ready.
“It was only after he unleashed his morbid reforms that he started groping in the dark, looking for solutions.
“We all recall that in October 2023, the Financial Times of London rebuked Bola Tinubu for announcing plans without ideas for how to implement them.
“Is the private sector not overburdened by Bola Tinubu’s failure to address the aftermath of his policies?”
The statement wondered if Onanuga would deny that Unilever, GlaxoSmithKline, Procter & Gamble , Sanofi-Aventi Nigeria, Bolt Food, Equinor, etc. had exited Nigeria, citing reasons including foreign exchange complexities, security concerns, and high operational costs.”
He went on to query the presidential aide on the cost of living, which he noted was pushing Nigerians into desperate times.
Ibe said the presidential aide “needs to read the official statistics from the National Bureau of Statistics: The annual inflation rate reached a nearly 30-year high of 28.9% in December 2023, up from 28.2% in November.”
Adding, “Would Bayo Onanuga deny that food prices, which constitute a significant portion of the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) basket, soared to 33.9% in December, the highest level since August 2005?
Would he also deny that in many states of the federation, citizens have blocked roads in protest?
“Just yesterday morning (Monday, February 5), it was reported that hundreds of residents of Minna in Niger State blocked major roads to protest hunger and the high cost of living in the country.
“Only failed leaders play the ostrich and live in self-denial.
“The Presidency’s response is full of lamentations and resorted to blame games. It is a familiar road travelled by the ruling party!
“It has become fashionable for every APC-led government to blame others, especially the opposition and external factors, for Nigeria’s economic woes. Now, Tinubu is elevating the blame game to the next level as he accuses his own party of lacklustre performance.
“The evidence, however, is overwhelming. Tinubu’s underperformance is largely attributable to leadership failures in the management of the economy.
“The failure of leadership by the APC-led government is staring every Nigerian in the face as the country’s economic, social, political, and security challenges persist and assume frightening dimensions.
“An unprepared leader such as Bola Tinubu’s fails to anticipate impending crisis and is always slow to react.”